As promised, here’s the February reading round-up. What’s caught my eye recently?
I was at SCCM two weeks ago, and would encourage anyone with an interest in critical care to read the Plenary Articles published in Critical Care Medicine. These presentations at the meeting were all nothing short of amazing.
And… the Sepsis Guidelines have been updated (note: it’s mostly tweaks, little that’s entirely new). If you’re not a critical care doctor, this is still important and relevant if you want to provide evidence-based best care when your patient has something go wrong.
In surgery we sometimes get to have conversations with patients and families when we don’t anticipate a completely smooth clinical course. I’ve been playing with this framework since Gretchen Schwarze came and talked to us about it last year, and I find it helpful. You might too.
Here’s some background work (with more great work coming) from my colleague Chris Pannucci on Anti-Xa level monitoring and perioperative use of enoxaparin.
Last year at the ASE meeting I was a little dismayed to find the frequency with which medical students use Wikipedia as a reference during the clerkship. This article provides some justification for simply embracing it and makes me question if we should have a Wikipedia “hackathon” during 2018 Surgery Education Week.
I’ve preached about the importance of allies for women in male-dominated fields before in this blog. Here’s another confirmatory article from HBR. Men, we really need your support, and if done right we can even benefit from your leadership.
Happy reading, all.