October 2017 Reading Round-up

I ran away to Montana for a few days and suddenly it’s October.  I don’t know why these things often surprise me, yet sometimes they do- particularly the months that change on the weekend.

So, what do I think is interesting at the moment?

In the world of burns, this article is one of what I hope will be many looking prospectively at blood product transfusion in our patients. Thanks to my friend Tina Palmieri for her fearless leadership of this important multi center trial.

I’m excited to share this systematic review by my Utah colleagues examining endovascular vs. open repair of AAA. Hint: lower mortality, higher complication rate.

The October issue of the American Journal of Surgery is the annual Association of Women Surgeons issue.  Regardless of gender or specialty, there’s pretty much something for everyone in there.

I hope this piece in Academic Medicine can help some of my pre-tenure friends and colleagues normalize their experience a bit.  It’s not easy.  It is worth it.

In place of a bonus reading recommendation this month, you get a bonus viewing recommendation. I am completely smitten with Simon Sinek‘s work right now and am obsessed with finding ways to incorporate it into academic medicine. Don’t know who he is?  Here’s his TEDTalk on “How great leaders inspire action.”  18 minutes well-spent, I promise.

Happy Fall, y’all!

 

September Reading Round-Up

Yes, we’re almost a week into the month. In a somewhat unusual turn of events, I actually took the holiday weekend OFF.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

So, what’s caught my eye recently? A few things.

  • Which surgery residents are most at risk for attrition? We have some ideas based upon this outstanding paper. Now we need to figure out WHY this happens.
  • We tend to be generous with pharmacologic therapies in the ICU setting, generally for good reason.  Nevertheless, medication errors are one of the most common safety report issues in hospitals. This Clinical Practice Guideline from SCCM reminds us that we do need to be good stewards and identifies the opportunities for doing so.
  • Are you struggling with giving your learners feedback?  It’s not a surprise with the dearth of high-quality, evidence based recommendations.
  • For those who aren’t aware that Montana has lost over 1 million acres to fires in the last two months, here’s a relevant online piece from the New Yorker. Between Harvey hitting my cultural homeland last week and watching a state I’ve grown to love burn, I’ve got a lot of sadness about events largely beyond anyone’s control right now.  Irma is the proverbial frosting on the cake.

Fun reading? I may have too many books going right now.  I pulled out some Brian Doyle (The Plover) for my trip to Portland last weekend because it only seemed appropriate. If you’re not familiar with his work, this essay gives you a lovely taste of it. I’m reading (and learning from!) Michael Bungay Stanier’s The Coaching Habit.  September book group is our annual foray into nonfiction, this month with Ta-Nahisi Coates Between the World and Me.

Happy almost-Fall, y’all.  Stay safe!

August 2017 Reading Round-Up

It was the 4th before I realized it was time for a new reading round up.  How did August happen?!?  And, of course, we’re back to business this month after last month’s not-so-light reading.

The “opidemic” is an issue getting plenty of press right now. And, of course, while patients deserve proper pain relief after we do things that hurt them (surgery, for example), we have an obligation to be responsible in our approach. Here’s more data about how often prescription opioids go unused after surgery. I’m proud of our group’s practice of carefully monitoring our prescribing practices, educating on safe storage, and providing lockboxes to patients.

There’s no question that Oregon Health Sciences is ahead of the curve in their development and implementation of the concept of the Academic RVU.  Here’s their story on how this happened and what it means for faculty.

Intraoperative teaching is not easy, and we know less about it than we should.  This systematic review synthesizes what we do know- particularly that there is often a disconnect between faculty and learner perceptions.

And a recent nonfiction read that definitely provides some good food for thought: A Selfish Plan to Change the World by Justin Dillon. Any book that instructs readers to “find their riot”?  That’s good enough for me.

 

July 2017 Reading (and listening) Round-up

It’s that time! Here’s the July, 2017 edition of what I’m reading, supplemented with some of what I’m listening to. Here’s a hint: It’s summertime, and I’m not going to give you any academic reading right now.  So there.

Fiction:

June’s book group novel was La Rose by Louise Erdrich.  The writing is lyrical, the story a bit magical…so much goodness, and it resulted in a juicy discussion.

I’m just settling into July’s selection: Case Histories by Kate Atwood.  I’ll report back, but the first 50 pages have been fascinating.

Nonfiction:

Barking up the Wrong Tree by Eric Barker– I’ve recommended his Sunday blog/ email more than once.  The book is a terrific complement to his usual investigation style that helps enhance personal success.

Other:

From HBR, ways to weave self-care into your workday.  I love that they also support the idea of not “shoulding” all over yourself.  It’s an unhealthy practice.

From the New Yorker, “America’s Future is Texas.” It’s a great explanation of how my home state really is a bellwether for current American politics.

Listening:

Sam Sanders (from NPR) is also an expat Texan and recently started his podcast, “It’s been a minute.” Tuesdays are a “deep dive” with another public figure, and Fridays are a catch-up for the week.  Highly recommended- I’m listening to his interview with Timothy Simons as I type.

For my foodie friends, I recently stumbled across “The Food Chain” from BBC.  Each week they focus on a food or food culture related topic in a very approachable manner.

Last but not least, a plug for NPR’s “Up First.” It comes out daily Monday-Friday and gives you 15 minutes of news highlights for the day.

Happy Dog Days of summer, folks!

 

May 2017 Reading Round-Up

Brand new month!

So what’s out there that is catching my eye?

We all spend quite a bit of time thinking about how to improve teaching of technical skills.  What about using video-based coaching to supplement OR teaching?

What does the public know (and want to know) about overlapping surgery?

The 2016 State of the Science articles for burn care are out. These cover everything from burn resuscitation to community reintegration, and are all important comments on where we are in burn care (and how far we have to go).

And bringing out my inner policy geek, here’s a great overview from Politico on what the impact is for the GOP if/ when Obamacare repeal fails.

Catching my ear is the “Up First” podcast from NPR. I seldom have time to listen closely to the news throughout the day, so this is a great summary of what’s happening.

Happy reading (and listening).

 

 

A slightly belated April reading round-up

I’ll start with an apology: I’ve not been on my A-game with keeping up with the blog lately. Lots of life distractions, many of which I’m hopeful will start to settle down soon.  It’s not been easy.

So, it is April, and a number of things out there have caught my eye.

The March print edition of JAMASurgery included this systematic review and metaanalysis of causes of attrition in general surgery residency. While I’m reasonably certain we can’t get the rate to zero because there are factors we cannot control, we must do what we can.

While we are all becoming painfully aware that too many narcotics are being prescribed for our patients, we tend to not have a good understanding of what constitutes too many or too much.  This study provides an important baseline for us as surgeons. I will also note that Annals of Surgery will have an ongoing series examining the opiod crisis from a surgical perspective.

We’re definitely talking more about delirium mitigation in our adult ICU patient population.  What about the children?  Apparently it’s a problem for them too (particularly with “inflammatory disorders,” which would definitely be my patient population!).

Going a bit outside of the medical journals, what’s next in hospital innovations to keep patients safe? I was thrilled to see my friend Amir Ghaferi‘s name as first author on this piece.

Pleasure reading?  Our book group is spending the next two months with one of my all-time favorites: The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay by Michael Chabon.  I am looking forward to re-experiencing it.

 

March 2017 Reading Round-Up

Ah, March.  Here you are, and you didn’t even come in like a lion.  Thanks for that.

First, more information confirming my own bias that communication with our patients and families matters, not just for the fundamental “it’s the right thing to do” reason, but because it also impacts risk of postoperative complications.

This terrific Perspectives piece discusses the role of trainees in the changing medical care landscape in the US.

As my own team works to identify risk factors for delirium in Burn patients, this article with risk factors following colorectal surgery may provide us with some guidance.

Were you there for my friend Mary Klingensmith’s fantastic ASE Presidential address last April?  If you missed it (or if you were there and loved it), here it is in print.

Side reading: February’s book group book was Alexander Marra’s The Tsar of Love and Techno. VERY highly recommended.

Reading-Round Up, February 2017 edition

As promised, here’s the February reading round-up.  What’s caught my eye recently?

I was at SCCM two weeks ago, and would encourage anyone with an interest in critical care to read the Plenary Articles published in Critical Care Medicine.  These presentations at the meeting were all nothing short of amazing.

And… the Sepsis Guidelines have been updated (note: it’s mostly tweaks, little that’s entirely new).  If you’re not a critical care doctor, this is still important and relevant if you want to provide evidence-based best care when your patient has something go wrong.

In surgery we sometimes get to have conversations with patients and families when we don’t anticipate a completely smooth clinical course.  I’ve been playing with this framework since Gretchen Schwarze came and talked to us about it last year, and I find it helpful.  You might too.

Here’s some background work (with more great work coming) from my colleague Chris Pannucci on Anti-Xa level monitoring and perioperative use of enoxaparin.

Last year at the ASE meeting I was a little dismayed to find the frequency with which medical students use Wikipedia as a reference during the clerkship.  This article provides some justification for simply embracing it and makes me question if we should have a Wikipedia “hackathon” during 2018 Surgery Education Week.

I’ve preached about the importance of allies for women in male-dominated fields before in this blog.  Here’s another confirmatory article from HBR. Men, we really need your support, and if done right we can even benefit from your leadership.

Happy reading, all.

January Reading Round-up

Brand new month! Brand new year!  So, what’s out there that’s caught my eye?

***Not to be missed reading for the surgeons*** The American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society have published updated guidelines on Surgical Site Infections.  Did I mention this should be mandatory reading for the surgeons?  Because it should.

If I remember correctly, this fantastic review manuscript on the crisis confidence in trainees was Dawn Elfenbein’s SERF project.  It’s also worth your time and illustrates the complexity of understanding confidence and its impact on our residents and junior faculty.

This is an excellent review of “what’s current in burn care” from the group at U of Alberta. HT to one of our plastics residents who shared it with me (since PRS is not in my usual journal wheelhouse).

If you’re one of our former students who have been “tortured” by the mock pages during your bootcamp course, here’s evidence supporting why we did that.  You’re welcome.

Residents are now required to participate in quality improvement; this report shows how that can be a truly meaningful experience for the residents and the patients.

Current non-medical professional reading, which I recommend highly: Appreciative Leadership by Whitney, Trosten-Bloom, and Rader.  I was hooked after the Inquiry chapter, and it has already proven invaluable.

Current non-medical, non-professional readingSally Mann‘s Hold Still. I only intended to read for 20 minutes last night.  That quickly turned into an hour between her amazing use of language and the photographs that are included in this memoir.

Happy 2017, y’all!

 

December 2016 Reading Round Up

It’s the last one of the year.  That’s a bit bittersweet (but not too much so!).

What’s caught my eye lately?  A few things…

The New Yorker often provides some of the best lay press reporting on medicine.  This article on hypothermia in trauma patients is no exception.

Maybe my bias comes from practicing a specialty that is already regionalized (at least here in the Mountain West).  This thoughtful piece presents regionalization as a possible strategy for improving surgical care more broadly.

I make plenty of jokes about midcareer in academic surgery being a bit like being Jan Brady- we simply don’t get much attention in terms of people supporting our ongoing career development, and while we’ve figured out how to get to where we are, there’s not always a clear road map on what’s next.  Janet Bickel does a nice job describing growth opportunities for those with the mid career blues.

I’ll confess that I’m thrilled to see Surgery publishing qualitative work. This piece is particularly interesting to me because of its examination of challenges and barriers for surgeon-scientists.

Pleasure reading: The Door by Magda Szabo was our book group reading for November.  I missed book group (call broke my soul) but loved the story in a strange way.  Of course, everything about November was strange, wasn’t it?